Categories
Intact

What Goes into Transition Planning?

Teams from Intact and OneBeacon have been working diligently throughout the transition to combine the strengths of our organizations. And while we don’t have all the approvals required to close just yet, the teams have been standing at the ready since September 1. But just how was this all possible in such a short timeframe, especially during peak vacation season?

The key was laying the foundation right after the announcement in May and getting the right people in place for a full kick-off less than one month later. The steering committee, including chairs and co-chairs, supported by the taskforce coordinators, established clear objectives and the deliverables for “day one” early in the summer so they could ensure the teams were focused on the right tasks, of which there were many! All combined, the 10 task forces had 73 key deliverables, and outlined close to 1,500 tasks to achieve those deliverables!

With more than 250 people involved from Intact and over 100  from OneBeacon, Natalie Higgins, Vice President, Corporate Development, noted, “Our shared values have gone a long way in forging the relationships needed to accomplish a plan that carries a high degree of complexity. There has been a tremendous amount of collaboration across all of the groups, helping us identify and plan for the best possible outcome in every scenario.”

Whether it was weekly steering committee and coordinator meetings, taskforce efforts or Charles’ and Mike’s visits across the offices, the frequent touchpoints and open communication channels have helped ensure productive dialogue. Knowing what was important to both Intact and OneBeacon helped the groups identify strengths and opportunities for creating value together. “The concept of cross-border teams and importing/exporting products is only possible by working together. These initiatives will help us create new value and wouldn’t have been possible without our two organizations coming together,” said Carla Smith, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development.

Both Carla and Natalie agreed that the exceptional group of coordinators were engaged, thorough and dedicated to ensuring the right issues were prioritized and escalated to the Steering Committee accordingly. Carla added, “While the transition structure and project-oriented approach were needed at the beginning, they now know one another and connect on a regular basis. It’s clear that we’ll be off to the races as one team, capitalizing on new opportunities as soon as we officially close.”

 

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The information contained in this communication may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or referenced in this communication that address activities, events or developments which we expect will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “will,” “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict” and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to our:

  • change in book value per share or return on equity;
  • business strategy;
  • financial and operating targets or plans;
  • incurred loss and loss adjustment expenses and the adequacy of our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves and related reinsurance;
  • projections of revenues, income (or loss), earnings (or loss) per share, dividends, market share or other financial forecasts;
  • expansion and growth of our business and operations;
  • proposed merger with Intact Financial Corporation (“Intact”);
  • future capital expenditures; and
  • pending legal proceedings.

These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and judgments about historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors believed to be appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to our expectations is subject to a number of risks, uncertainties or other factors which are described in more detail beginning on page 16 of the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations, including:

  • recorded loss and loss adjustment expense reserves subsequently proving to have been inadequate;
  • changes in interest rates, debt or equity markets or other market volatility that negatively impact our investment portfolio;
  • competitive forces and the cyclicality of the property and casualty insurance industry;
  • claims arising from catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, floods or terrorist attacks;
  • the continued availability of capital and financing;
  • the continued availability and cost of reinsurance coverage and our ability to collect reinsurance recoverables;
  • the ability to maintain data and system security;
  • the outcome of litigation and other legal or regulatory proceedings;
  • our ability to continue meeting our debt and related service obligations or to pay dividends;
  • our ability to successfully develop new specialty businesses;
  • changes in laws or regulations, or their interpretations, which are applicable to us, our competitors, our agents or our customers;
  • actions taken by rating agencies from time to time with respect to us, such as financial strength or credit rating downgrades or placing our ratings on negative watch;
  • our ability to retain key personnel;
  • participation in guaranty funds and mandatory market mechanisms;
  • our ability to maintain effective operating procedures and manage operational risk;
  • changes to current shareholder dividend practice and regulatory restrictions on dividends;
  • credit risk exposure in certain of our business operations;
  • Bermuda law may afford less protection to shareholders;
  • our status as a subsidiary of White Mountains, including potential conflicts of interest, competition, and related-party transactions;
  • changes in tax laws or tax treaties;
  • the risk that the proposed merger with Intact may not be completed on the currently contemplated timeline or at all;
  • risks related to diverting management’s attention from our ongoing business operations and other risks related to the pendency of the proposed merger with Intact, including on our ability to retain and hire key personnel, our ability to maintain relationships with our customers, policyholders, brokers, service providers and others with whom we do business, our stock price and our business, financial condition and results of operations generally;
  • the risk that shareholder litigation in connection with the proposed merger with Intact may result in significant costs of defense, indemnification and liability; and other factors, most of which are beyond our control.

 

Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this communication are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the anticipated results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences. Readers should carefully review these risk factors, and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this communication speak only as of the date on which they are made. We assume no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *